Noisw have I got this straight?

Cardinal Schoenborn believes that Amoris Laetitia is ‘obviously’ a magisterial document and that as such it trumps all previous statements of the magisterium, which must now be ‘read in its light’.

Are we, in consequence, to conclude that development of doctrine – once thought to be a process of centuries of reflection and reception –  can, in these enlightened times, be achieved in a matter of forty years or less?

Familiaris Consortio (1981) and Veritatis Splendor (1993) ‘read in the light of’ Amoris Laetitia (2016) are surely quite different documents. That being the case, the best advice a confessor can give (if the penitent is less than fifty years old) is to hang on in there in the hopeful expectation of another encyclical or another Pope.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s